SPC

Statistical Process Control and Process Capability key highlights


1. Reduction of process variability

2. Monitoring and surveillance of a process

3. Estimation of product or process parameters


If a product is to meet or exceed customer expectations, generally it should be produced by a

process that is stable or repeatable


SPC seven major tools are

1. Histogram or stem-and-leaf plot

2. Check sheet

3. Pareto chart

4. Cause-and-effect diagram

5. Defect concentration diagram

6. Scatter diagram

7. Control chart - Skewart - technically most complicated


The proper deployment of SPC helps create an environment

in which all individuals in an organization seek continuous improvement in quality

and productivity. This environment is best developed when management becomes involved in

the process. Once this environment is established, routine application of the magnificent

seven becomes part of the usual manner of doing business, and the organization is well on its

way to achieving its quality improvement objectives.



the statistical concepts that form the basis of SPC, we must first describe Shewhart’s theory of variability.



In any production process, regardless of how well designed or carefully maintained it is, a certain

amount of inherent or natural variability will always exist. This natural variability or

“background noise” is the cumulative effect of many small, essentially unavoidable causes. In

the framework of statistical quality control, this natural variability is often called a “stable

system of chance causes.” A process that is operating with only chance causes of variation

present is said to be in statistical control. In other words, the chance causes are an inherent

part of the process.



Other kinds of variability may occasionally be present in the output of a process. This

variability in key quality characteristics usually arises from three sources: improperly

adjusted or controlled machines, operator errors, or defective raw material. Such variability is

generally large when compared to the background noise, and it usually represents an unacceptable

level of process performance. We refer to these sources of variability that are not part

of the chance cause pattern as assignable causes of variation. A process that is operating in

the presence of assignable causes is said to be an out-of-control process.1


t1 forward, the presence of assignable causes has resulted in an out-of-control process.

Processes will often operate in the in-control state for relatively long periods of time.

However, no process is truly stable forever, and, eventually, assignable causes will occur,

seemingly at random, resulting in a shift to an out-of-control state where a larger proportion

of the process output does not conform to requirements.



The chart contains a center line that represents the average value of

the quality characteristic corresponding to the in-control state. (That is, only chance

causes are present.) Two other horizontal lines, called the upper control limit (UCL) and

the lower control limit (LCL), are also shown on the chart. These control limits are chosen

so that if the process is in control, nearly all of the sample points will fall between

them.


If the process is in control, all the

plotted points should have an essentially random pattern.

There is a close connection between control charts and hypothesis testing.



For example, the mean could shift instantaneously to a new value and remain there

(this is sometimes called a sustained shift); or it could shift abruptly; but the assignable cause

could be short-lived and the mean could then return to its nominal or in-control value; or the

assignable cause could result in a steady drift or trend in the value of the mean. Only the sustained

shift fits nicely within the usual statistical hypothesis testing model.



The hypothesis testing framework is useful in many ways, but there are some differences

in viewpoint between control charts and hypothesis tests. For example, when testing statistical

hypotheses, we usually check the validity of assumptions, whereas control charts are used to

detect departures from an assumed state of statistical control.



In general, we should not worry

too much about assumptions such as the form of the distribution or independence when we are

applying control charts to a process to reduce variability and achieve statistical control.

Furthermore, an assignable cause can result in many different types of shifts in the process

parameters. For example, the mean could shift instantaneously to a new value and remain there

(this is sometimes called a sustained shift); or it could shift abruptly; but the assignable cause

could be short-lived and the mean could then return to its nominal or in-control value; or the

assignable cause could result in a steady drift or trend in the value of the mean. Only the sustained

shift fits nicely within the usual statistical hypothesis testing model.



One place where the hypothesis testing framework is useful is in analyzing the performance

of a control chart. For example, we may think of the probability of type I error of the

control chart (concluding the process is out of control when it is really in control) and the

probability of type II error of the control chart (concluding the process is in control when it

is really out of control). It is occasionally helpful to use the operating-characteristic curve of

a control chart to display its probability of type II error. This would be an indication of the

ability of the control chart to detect process shifts of different magnitudes. This can be of

value in determining which type of control chart to apply in certain situations. For more discussion

of hypothesis testing, the role of statistical theory, and control charts, see Woodall

(2000).


We may give a general model for a control chart. Let w be a sample statistic that measures

some quality characteristic of interest, and suppose that the mean of w is mw and the

standard deviation of w is sw



A very important part of the corrective action process associated with control chart

usage is the out-of-control-action plan (OCAP). An OCAP is a flow chart or text-based

description of the sequence of activities that must take place following the occurrence of an

activating event. These are usually out-of-control signals from the control chart. The OCAP

consists of checkpoints, which are potential assignable causes, and terminators, which are

actions taken to resolve the out-of-control condition, preferably by eliminating the assignable

cause. It is very important that the OCAP specify as complete a set as possible of checkpoints

and terminators, and that these be arranged in an order that facilitates process diagnostic

activities. Often, analysis of prior failure modes of the process and/or product can be helpful

in designing this aspect of the OCAP. Furthermore, an OCAP is a living document in the sense

that it will be modified over time as more knowledge and understanding of the process is

gained. Consequently, when a control chart is introduced, an initial OCAP should accompany

it. Control charts without an OCAP are not likely to be useful as a process improvement tool.




three things we need:

in the x-bar chart , we specified a sample size of five measurements, three-sigma

control limits, and the sampling frequency to be every hour. Increasing Sample Size will reduce

the probability of type-II error